Analytics, Website Marketing, and Development

Thursday, December 4, 2008

I Love Google but...

I love Google! They provide incredible services to the online community for free! Plus, they're giving away Gmail stickers now too!

However, I agree with Brian Clark at CopyBlogger in that we shouldn't use so much energy to game the system. We need to concentrate on excellent content that is useful to many people. Writing a bunch of blog posts only to fill your site with keywords might get you some random search traffic, but it's not even close to having loyal subscribers.

Simple comparison:
1. You get 1000 visitors in a month thanks to the 200 posts you wrote that were strategically written to include buzzwords from the long tail and the short head.
- Super~ These people will give you about 10 seconds of their time before they see what you've done. Real people can easily recognize a post that's stuffed with keywords or that was purely written to attract the search engines. You got a visitor, but they'll never be back.

2. You have 100 subscribers that read every one of your posts. They visit your site and occasionally leave comments. Maybe a few of them have blogs of their own and like to comment about your posts from there. Yes, that's an inbound link that will help your search rank. You didn't get it by spamming the Internet with garbage. You got it by writing content that someone found useful. They found it so useful that they took time out of their day to write about it and give you a link. Now the readers of that blog, who trust what the writer has to say, click over to your blog. Snap! More subscribers. And the cycle continues.

A little more math to back up #2: If you write 10 high-quality posts per month and all 100 subscribers visit, that's 1000 visits right there. Add in the link juice and the fact that it will naturally contain good keywords, and you can expect a ton more traffic than #1.

Moral of the Story:
Everyone please stop writing posts solely for the search engines! Yes, I'm guilty too, but I'm starting to come around. When writing a post pretend that you're writing a letter to a friend. If you wouldn't send this to a friend, then why would anyone else care to read it? If you don't pass that qualifier, don't write the post.

Labels: , ,

Add to your bookmarks:

Add to del.icio.us Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Technorati Add to Reddit Add to Squidoo Add to Google Add to Yahoo Add to Netscape

Sunday, August 3, 2008

Cuil - Another Post About Them Not Measuring Up

Well, it's pretty obvious that they hype over the new search engine, Cuil, was far greater than what the site could actually deliver.

I won't repeat all of the reasons they won't be the next Google killer. If you're reading this, you've surely read about them all several times already. Instead, I did a semi-scientific test of their search results. Since they claim to be the largest search engine in existence, they should have the highest number of results for any given search term. Right???

I chose several words at random as they popped into my head. I searched for these terms on Google.com, Yahoo.com, MSN.com, and Cuil.com and recorded the number of search results. For Cuil, the findings are probably not what they were hoping for. Without any more chit chat, let's get to the charts and graphs!

Search Test Report




From the chart above, you can clearly see that Yahoo! dominates as far as search results go. We're not talking about relevancy, we're only interested in number of search results returned. Google could be considered second, beating MSN and Cuil most of the time. Surprisingly, MSN had the lowest number of total results throughout the entire test. (Even lower than Cuil) Something odd were the search terms where Cuil beat out all other search engines, even Yahoo!.


  • "asp.net books" - Cuil: 602,186,415 / Yahoo!: 26,200,000

  • "google knol" - Cuil: 38,607,628 / Yahoo!: 15,400,000

  • "make liquid soap" - Cuil: 127,604,750 / Yahoo!: 12,500,000



This may not be the most scientific test, or be the definitive demise of Cuil, but if they're the largest search engine in the universe, why don't they give me the most search results??? Please let me know what you think in the comments.

Raw Search Data











































microsoftcuilgoogleyahoo
yahoo29900000054603279029300000007020000000
money638000000172724615913100000004620000000
google18900000051638638827500000004510000000
web development532000000133747321900000004060000000
real estate2910000006408039107070000003160000000
cars2250000008145112558550000002540000000
microsoft2370000005205782889070000002070000000
facebook20800158322134060000001590000000
american business6460000001917726985000001520000000
myspace30800001324508518610000001510000000
internet access764000000327637651760000001020000000
batman2570000040819411102000000469000000
ferrari6820000067216311162000000335000000
porsche7700000075242044141000000321000000
linkedin703000005704636147000000310000000
britney spears83000000136397691105000000214000000
foreclosure167000007199796148100000198000000
lamborghini137000001765089862700000193000000
visual studio1230000002518100743500000165000000
php books2180000008159023200000150000000
spiderman225000001852969950500000149000000
hacking14200000014807168753000000144000000
superman211000003422402061800000104000000
jason green1930000049203360000099000000
riaa34900006881174821000030600000
asp.net books5080000602186415792000026200000
led flashlight41800001071520251000025200000
bike commuting9770006105967100016600000
google knol63500003860762890400015400000
excel macro32000008887264900013400000
make liquid soap462000012760475075100012500000
volcano eruption256000013610124400008390000
johannes brahms5510000211969041100007290000
cuil7150012473715400005910000
monty python holy grail101000018983414120004780000
dns cache attacks23600007032802200004400000
fryderyk chopin5200000110129414400001270000
grocery shrink ray16400043446659000777000
Total:476937330063860835621222573600036643717000

Labels: , , , , ,

Add to your bookmarks:

Add to del.icio.us Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Technorati Add to Reddit Add to Squidoo Add to Google Add to Yahoo Add to Netscape

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Google Acquires DoubleClick!

Today, the EU approved the Google / DoubleClick deal.

Here are the key points regarding the acquisition:
1. $3.1 Billion (YouTube only got $1.65 Billion)
2. Antitrust concerns were put to rest because anyone can use services from Microsoft, AOL, or Yahoo.
3. Integration of the two companies will start soon.

I'm not going to try to compete with all of the other posts about this topic. If you want the colorful commentary, please read their posts below.

Google's Press Release

The Official Google Blog : We've officially acquired DoubleClick

SearchEngineWatch : EU Approves Google DoubleClick Deal

Reuters : Google closes DoubleClick merger after EU approval

SearchEngineLand : EU Approves Google-DoubleClick Acquisition

TechCrunch : Google Spends $3.1 Billion To Acquire DoubleClick

As you can see, there is plenty of buzz around this acquisition. I'll continue to add useful links as I find them.

Labels: , , ,

Add to your bookmarks:

Add to del.icio.us Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Technorati Add to Reddit Add to Squidoo Add to Google Add to Yahoo Add to Netscape

Friday, February 29, 2008

Google Pittsburgh - Dapper

The Pittsburgh Google office is having a technical event on Tuesday, March 4th. It looks like this will be a very technical discussion. They'll be discussing "Dapper", which is a system for monitoring large, distributed applications at Google.

The title of the talk is "Dapper: It's 11 p.m. and do you know where your RPC is?"

Bonus: There will be beer, wine, and snacks.

I may attend mostly to have a look at our Pittsburgh Google office, and to meet some of the local Googlers. I was lucky to attend a seminar at Google's Mountain View headquarters, and it was a great experience. Avinash Kaushik probably has the most detailed description of the Googleplex, so I'll defer to him to explain how cool it is.

If you plan to attend this Pittsburgh event, please drop me a line. Perhaps we could meet up.

Labels: , , ,

Add to your bookmarks:

Add to del.icio.us Add to digg Add to StumbleUpon Add to Technorati Add to Reddit Add to Squidoo Add to Google Add to Yahoo Add to Netscape